Published: 23.01.1998.
On Compliance of Para 2 of the Decision by the Supreme Council of the Republic of Latvia of 15 September 1992 "On the Procedure of Entering into Force of the Law On Coercive Expropriation of Real Estate for State or Public Needs " (in the Wording of the law of 19 December 1996) with Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Years
1998
Stages of the proceedings
Adjudicated
Outcome of the proceedings
Judgement
Type of the proceedings
Court sitting with the participation of the participants of the case
Applicant
Not less than 20 deputies of Parliament
Applicant: 6.Saeimas deputāti: V.Kalnbērzs, M.Lujāns, G.Valdmanis, A.Golubovs, M.Bekasovs, J.Strods, V.Stikuts, O.Grinbergs, A.Saulītis, K.Čerāns, O.Deņisovs, G.Gannusa, E.Zelgalvis, U.Veldre, L.Stašs, A.Rubins, V.Dozorcevs, E.Grinovskis, A.Bartaševičs un J.Urbanovičs.
Date of the judgment: 30.04.1998.
Official publication: 05.05.1998.

On Compliance of Para 2 of the Decision by the Supreme Council of the Republic of Latvia of 15 September 1992 "On the Procedure of Entering into Force of the Law On Coercive Expropriation of Real Estate for State or Public Needs " (in the Wording of the law of 19 December 1996) with Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Constitutional Court decided to declare the second and the fourth part of Paragraph 2 of the Supreme Council 15 September, 1992 Resolution ” On the Procedure by which the Republic of Latvia Law ”On Eminent Domain ” Takes Effect”” as being in compliance with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the November 4, 1950 European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Judgment_1 (Case No 09-02(98))