Published: 25.09.2001.
On Compliance of Para 26 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Years
2001
Stages of the proceedings
Adjudicated
Outcome of the proceedings
Judgement
Type of the proceedings
Court sitting with the participation of the participants of the case
Applicant
Person
Applicant: Mārtiņš Draudiņš, Valdis Eglītis un Viktors Purmalis
Date of the judgment: 19.03.2002.
Official publication: 20.03.2002.

On Compliance of Para 26 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court decided to declare Paragraph 26 of the Pension Law Transitional Provisions as unconformable with Article 1 of the Satversme and null and void from the day of publishing the Judgment.

Judgment_1 (Case No 2001-12-01)