Date of the judgment: 04.06.2002.
Official publication: 05.06.2002.
On Compliance of the Requirement, Incorporated into the Public Procurator’s Office Law (Section 33(1))the Republic of Latvia Advocacy Law (Para 3 of Section 14) and Notariate law (Para 3 of Section 9), Envisaging the Necessity of Opinion by the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia with Articles 91 and 106 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Constitutional Court decided to declare the norm incorporated into the first part of Article 33 of the Public Procurator’s Office Law, Article 14 (Paragraph 3) of the Law on Advokatūra (on Legal Profession) and Article 9 (Paragraph 3) of the Notary Law ”…in the University of Latvia or any other higher education institution compatible with the University of Latvia in accordance with the opinion by the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia” as unconformable with Articles 91 and 106 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme and null and void as of the day of publishing of the Judgment.