Published: 05.10.2004.
On Compliance of Para 32 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.
Years
2004
Stages of the proceedings
Adjudicated
Outcome of the proceedings
Judgement
Type of the proceedings
Written procedure
Applicant
Person
Applicant: Mārtiņš Draudiņš, Alberts Krols, Jevgēnija Borovska, Mārtiņš Skuja, Jānis Botmanis, Jānis Koponāns, Aivars Bērziņš, Astrīda Krakope, Raimonds Millers, Viktors Stepičevs, Mihails Bondarevs, Taisija Antmane, Alberts Beļajevs, Elga Akotiņa, Ivars Kārkliņš, Maija Ausekle, Eduards Šņukuts, Francis Buļs, Artūrs Elksnis, Almants Balodis un Elmārs Gultnieks
Date of the judgment: 06.04.2005.
Official publication: 07.04.2005.

On Compliance of Para 32 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions with Article1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

Constitutional Court ruled to declare Paragraph 32 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law ”On State Pensions” as unconformable with Article 109 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme and null and void from the moment when Paragraph 26 of the Transitional Provisions of the Pension Law lost effect, that is, from March 20, 2002.

Judgment_1 (Case No 2004-21-01)