Published: 31.03.2006.
On Compliance of Paragraph 16, Subparagraph 12 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions Transitional Provisions with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Years
2006
Stages of the proceedings
Adjudicated
Outcome of the proceedings
Judgement
Type of the proceedings
Written procedure
Applicant
Person
Applicant: Ērika Gailīte, Dzidra Unbedahte, Gunārs Kampmanis, Jānis Meškovs, Solomeja Kundziņa, Rimma Elksniņa, Renāte Škute, Daina Galvāne, Regīna Joniņa, Kapitalīna Nagle, Astrīda Petaško, Vera Lucenko, Imants Mikāls, Krišs Alfrēds Druvas, Pēteris Artūrs Briedis un Videvuds Lielpēteris
Date of the judgment: 08.11.2006.
Official publication: 15.11.2006.

On Compliance of Paragraph 16, Subparagraph 12 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pensions Transitional Provisions with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case short name: The Granting of Pensions Anew

Constitutional Court ruled to declare Paragraph 16, Subparagraph 12 of the Transitional Provisions of the Law ”On State Pensions” as conformable with Sections 1, 91 and 109 of the Republic of Latvia Satversme.

Judgment_1 (Case No 2006-04-01)