Published: 28.06.2006.
On Compliance of the Provision “if This Person was not Been Employed (is not Deemed to Be an Employee or Self-Employed Person in Accordance with the Law on State Social Insurance)” of Section 7.1 of Law On State Social Allowances with Articles 91 and 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Years
2006
Stages of the proceedings
Adjudicated
Outcome of the proceedings
Judgement
Type of the proceedings
Written procedure
Applicant
Person
Applicant: Jeļena Patrina, Alla Malohatko un Ilga Beča
Date of the judgment: 21.02.2007.
Official publication: 27.02.2007.

On Compliance of the Provision “if This Person was not Been Employed (is not Deemed to Be an Employee or Self-Employed Person in Accordance with the Law on State Social Insurance)” of Section 7.1 of Law On State Social Allowances with Articles 91 and 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case short name: The Allowance for Caring for a Disabled Child

Constitutional Court held to recognize the provision contained in the first part of Section 71 of the Law On The State Social Allowances - “if the referred to person is not employed (is not deemed to be an employee or self-employed person in accordance with the Law on State Social Insurance)” to be in conflict with Section 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia” and invalid from January 1, 2006.

Judgment_1 (Case No 2006-08-01)