Published: 15.06.2007.
On Compliance of the Words "on an Ongoing Basis" of the Provision Included in Para 6 of the Cabinet Regulation No. 644 of 8 August 2006, Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement with Articles 91 and 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Years
2007
Stages of the proceedings
Adjudicated
Outcome of the proceedings
Judgement
Type of the proceedings
Written procedure
Applicant
Person
Applicant: Irina Ševčenko
Date of the judgment: 19.12.2007.
Official publication: 28.12.2007.

On Compliance of the Words "on an Ongoing Basis" of the Provision Included in Para 6 of the Cabinet Regulation No. 644 of 8 August 2006, Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement with Articles 91 and 110 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case short name: The Allowance for Child Care

Constitutional Court held that the words “on an ongoing basis” of Para 6 of the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No. 644 of August 8, 2006 “Regulations Regarding the Amount of the Allowance for Child Care and the Supplement to the Allowance for Child Care for Twins or More Children Born During One Delivery, the Review Procedures Thereof, Procedures for the Granting and Payment of the Allowance and Supplement” do not comply with Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and are invalid as of March 1, 2006.

Judgment_1 (Case No 2007-13-03)