Published: 01.11.2007.
On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Section 50 (2) of the Sentence Execution Code of Latvia with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Years
2007
Stages of the proceedings
Adjudicated
Outcome of the proceedings
Judgement
Type of the proceedings
Written procedure
Applicant
Person
Applicant: Boriss Klopcovs
Date of the judgment: 09.05.2008.
Official publication: 13.05.2008.

On Compliance of the Second Sentence of Section 50 (2) of the Sentence Execution Code of Latvia with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case short name: The Postal Expenditure

Constitutional Court helds that the second sentence of the second part of Section 50 of the Latvian Penalty Execution Code, insofar as it does not provide to pay from the State budget for posting of submissions regarding the disputing of an administrative act or factual activities and requests for legal assistance for those prisoners who have no financial resources, does not comply with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and is invalid as from November 1, 2008.

Judgment_1 (Case No 2007-24-01)