Date of the judgment: 13.02.2009.
Official publication: 18.02.2009.
On Compliance of the Word “Lease"” Used in Section 12(3) of Law On Land Reform in the Cities of the Republic of Latvia and the First and Second Part of Section 54 of Law On Privatisation of State and Local Government Residential Buildings with the First Sentence of Article 91 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Constitutional Court held that the Word “Norm” Used in the Third Part of Section 12 of the Law “On Land Reform in the Cities of the Republic of Latvia” and the First and Second Part of Section 54 of the Law “On Apartment House Privatization” complies with the First Sentence of Article 91 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.