Date of the judgment: 15.04.2009.
Official publication: 21.04.2009.
On Compliance of the Words “Apartment Houses” of Section 12(2) of Law On Land Reform in the Cities of the Republic of Latvia and Para 7 of the Transitional Provisions Thereof, and the First Sentence of Section 54(2) of Law On Privatization of State and Local Government Apartment House”, and Para 40 of the Transitional Provisions Thereof with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Constitutional Court held that the words “apartment eesidential houses” of the second part of Section 12 of the Law “On Land Reform in the Cities of the Republic of Latvia” and Para 7 of the Transitional Provisions thereof insofar as the restrictions of the lease payment apply to the land under residential aparment houses, and the first sentence of the second part of Section 54 of the Law “On Privatization of State and Local Government Residential Houses”, and Para 40 of the Transitional Provisions thereof do not comply with Article 1 and Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia and are invalid as from 1 November 2009.