Published: 27.04.2009.
On Compliance of the Words "State Pensions Shall Not Be Revised in 2009" of Section 2 of Law "On Amendments to Law On State Pensions" of 12 March 2009 with Article 1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Years
2009
Stages of the proceedings
Adjudicated
Outcome of the proceedings
Judgement
Type of the proceedings
Written procedure
Applicant
Not less than 20 deputies of Parliament
Applicant: 9.Saeimas deputāti: A.Klementjevs, A.Štokenbergs, N.Ušakovs, I.Ribakovs, J.Tutins, V.Orlovs, J.Urbanovičs, A.Vidavskis, V.Agešins, O.Deņisovs, N.Kabanovs, A.Golubovs, S.Mirskis, S.Fjodorovs, I.Klementjevs, A.Mirskis, A.Rubiks, S.Dolgopolovs, A.Pabriks, B.Cilevičs
Date of the judgment: 26.11.2009.
Official publication: 27.11.2009.

On Compliance of the Words "State Pensions Shall Not Be Revised in 2009" of Section 2 of Law "On Amendments to Law On State Pensions" of 12 March 2009 with Article 1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case short name: The Non-revision of Pensions

Constitutional Court held that the words “State pensions shall not be examined in 2009” of Section 2 of 12 March 2009 Law “Amendments to the Law “On State Pensions” comply with Article 1 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

Judgment_1 (Case No 2009-08-01)