Published: 21.04.2010.
On Compliance of Para 30 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pension" with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Years
2010
Stages of the proceedings
Adjudicated
Outcome of the proceedings
Judgement
Type of the proceedings
Written procedure
Applicant
Person
Applicant: Pieteikuma iesniedzēja: Ramona Pabērza, Jānis Ozoliņš un Valdis Graudiņš
Date of the judgment: 18.02.2011.
Official publication: 22.02.2011.

On Compliance of Para 30 of Transitional Provisions of Law On State Pension" with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Constitutional Court held that the Para 30 of Transitional Provisions of the Law “On State Pensions” does comply with Article 1, Article 91 and Article 109 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia.

Press-releases