Date of the judgment: 29.10.2012.
Official publication: 31.10.2012.
On Compliance of Section 141 (1), Insofar as It Fails to Provide the Right to Submit an Ancillary Complaint for a Decision Rejecting an Application on Securing of a Claim and a Decision Rejecting an Application on Revocation of the Security of a Claim, with Article 92 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: The Appeal in the Case of Securing a ClaimConstitutional Court held to recognise Section 141(1) of the Civil Procedure Law, insofar as it fails to provide the right to submit an ancillary complaint for a decisions satisfying an application on revocation of the security of a claim, as compatible with Article 92 of the Satversme.
Press-releases
- The norm of the Civil Procedure Law regulating the procedure for submitting ancillary complaints does comply with the Satversme
- The Constitutional Court has initiated proceedings on a norm of the Civil Procedure Law regulating submission of an ancillary complaint