Published: 20.10.2014.
On Compliance of Para 1 of Section 36(2), Section 42 and Words in Section 177(3) "with or without confiscation of property" of the Criminal Law with the Second and Third Sentence of Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Years
2014
Stages of the proceedings
Adjudicated
Outcome of the proceedings
Judgement
Type of the proceedings
Written procedure
Applicant
Person
Applicant: Tatjana Kargina
Date of the judgment: 08.04.2015.
Official publication: 10.04.2015.

On Compliance of Para 1 of Section 36(2), Section 42 and Words in Section 177(3) "with or without confiscation of property" of the Criminal Law with the Second and Third Sentence of Article 105 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia

Case short name: The Confiscation of Property

The Constitutional Court recognised the contested norms as being compatible with Article 105 of the Satversme.

Press-releases