Published: 24.07.2024.
On the compliance of the words “four per cent” in the second sentence of Article 38(2) and of Article 42(7) of the law “On the Time Period of Coming into Force and the Procedures for the Application of the Introduction, Parts on Inheritance Rights and Property Rights of the Renewed Civil Law of 1937 of the Republic of Latvia” with Article 1 and the first and third sentences of Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia
Years
2024
Stages of the proceedings
Adjudicated
Type of the proceedings
Court sitting with the participation of the participants of the case
Applicant
Person
Applicant: Gabriela Diāna Kaplāne; Uri Traub; Brigita Anna Muške; SIA “Lansija”; Rasmus Māris Jāvalds; Žanete Aščuka; Artūrs Solozemnieks; Uģis Eriņš; SIA “LansiMed”; akciju sabiedrība “ZEMES ĪPAŠNIEKU ĢILDE”; SIA “Reģionālā zemju pārvalde”; SIA “PZD-2”; SIA “PZD-1”; SIA “PZD-4”; SIA “PZD-10”; kooperatīvā sabiedrība “Kibbutz”; SIA “Teroli”; Ilze Ķīse; Rīgas Grebenščikova vecticībnieku draudze; Ināra Penēze; Dagnija Sniķere
Date of the judgment: 10.12.2025.
Official publication: -

On the compliance of the words “four per cent” in the second sentence of Article 38(2) and of Article 42(7) of the law “On the Time Period of Coming into Force and the Procedures for the Application of the Introduction, Parts on Inheritance Rights and Property Rights of the Renewed Civil Law of 1937 of the Republic of Latvia” with Article 1 and the first and third sentences of Article 105 of the Constitution of the Republic of Latvia

Combined case: 2024-21-0103

Judgment_1 (Case No 2024-21-0103)