Date of the judgment: 27.06.2016.
Official publication: 29.06.2016.
On Compliance of Section 7(3) of Law On Prevention of Conflict of Interest in Activities of Public Officials with the First Sentence of Article 110 and the First Sentence of Article 91 of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia
Case short name: A Judge as an Assistant to a Disabled Family MemberThe Constitutional Court decided that the contested norm is incompatible with the first sentence of Article 91 of the Satversme.
Press-releases
- The norm, which prohibits a judge as a public official to be an assistant to a disabled member of his family, while living in a shared household, is incompatible with the Satversme
- A Case has been Initiated with regard to the Prohibition for a Judge to Combine Offices